Memorandum
To: C. Spanos, Associate Dean for Research
T.
King Liu, Microlab Faculty Director
From: K. Voros,
Operations Manager
Subject: 2007 Year-End Report
Date: 23 February 2008
Microlab operations continued in a holding pattern in 2007. Our goal was to keep operations moving smoothly, on target financially, in anticipation for the eventual move into the new facility. Construction of the Marvell Nanofabrication Laboratory is progressing on schedule, with a beneficial occupancy date, Spring 2009, as target.
This is the 21st
year-end report I am submitting.
II. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES
F a c i l i t i e s
Notable in 2007: Replumbing of nitrogen gas delivery lines such that Cory Hall laboratories are supplied separately from the Microlab; consolidation of equipment in room 145 into half of the space; move of the device characterization lab into 490 (both to make room for new faculty labs); major reliability improvement on the lam etchers and lam5 software upgrade; technics-c upgrade for improved 6” uniformity; replacement of the wafer saw with a donated unit, which also had problems; pumps database completed for improved pump management.
Notable in 2007: mix and match photolitography using the ASML and GCA steppers, also with Standford’s ASML tool; characterization of upgraded tools, technics-c, lam5, heatpulse4; process development for MEMS Exchange; and providing ETR service to other universities.
Baseline activities are an integral part of process engineering. The report on the
latest 35 μm run came out in February 2007. See
http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2007/EECS-2007-26.pdf
·
Todd Merport, Computer Operations Manager describes systems
maintenance, operational improvements and upgrades. Our computers and lab
control software were maintained at the highest levels of uptime and integrity. There was another
server upgrade which enabled retiring of our old argon server. Several
migrations occurred at the same time, to distribute load more evenly.
In 2007 the Mercury project made good progress and the
equipment user interface was finalized.
We have made several decisions concerning what should be included in
this part of the software and moved all the non-interactive details, such as
reports and forms to web-based applications.
Construction of the new
engineering building, CITRIS, including our new lab, the Marvell
Nanofabrication Laboratory, continues at a rapid rate. At this time the target
for beneficial occupancy is Spring 2009, which means we can start moving in. We
do not anticipate shutting down the Microlab for the move; however, there will
be slow downs in selected areas. Planning is in progress. Details in Dr.
Flounders’ report.
Machine Shop
The Machine Shop completed 296
jobs for 47 PIs in FY 2006/2007.
Financially the Shop has been struggling to maintain operations fully on
recharge basis. Because of the shift in the type of work requested of the Shop
towards facilities maintenance and equipment repairs in situ, and the slow down
of work for fine machining, staff had
to be reduced by one principal laboratory mechanician by the end of 2007.
Hopefully this will move finances of the Shop towards a positive outcome. The
Shop’s website lists capabilities, contact information, job request forms and
general information such as photographs of completed jobs, at http://mshop-erso.berkeley.edu. See Ben Lake’s
report for details.
S t a f f
Microlab staff groups are organized along functional lines as described below. The Machine Shop operates independently, under the Microlab Operations Manager.
Table 1 – Staff Organizational
Chart
The Microlab has been successful in retaining and developing staff well tuned to the laboratory’s needs. Cross training, back-ups and multiple responsibilities in all positions ensure that lab operations have broad coverage and problems are attended on a timely manner (Table 2).
This past year we developed a 6-month internship program, at the end of which we were able to hire the intern into a Development Technician IV position.
Microlab Operations (25 FTE) Katalin
Voros, Principal Development Engineer, Operations Manager |
1.
Equipment and Facilities (10
FTE) Bob Hamilton, Principal
Development Engineer, Manager Joe Donnelly, Associate
Development Engineer David Lo, Associate Development
Engineer Jay Morford, Assistant
Development Engineer Danny Pestal, Assistant
Development Engineer Evan Stateler, Senior Development
Engineer Phill Guillory, Senior
Development Engineer , Supervisor Alan Briggs, Development
Technician IV Mike Linan, Associate
Development Engineer, Supervisor Brian McNeil, Development Technician V |
2.
Process/Baseline (8 FTE) Sia Parsa,
Principal Development Engineer, Manager Kim Chan, Assistant Development
Engineer Jimmy Chang, Senior Development
Engineer Marilyn Kushner, Junior
Development Engineer Laszlo Petho, Associate
Specialist – Baseline Attila Szabo, Associate
Specialist – MEMS 4 student assistants, 0.5 FTE each |
3.
Administration (4 FTE) Rosemary
Spivey, Administrative Analyst, Manager Nancy
Peshette, Administrative Assistant III (0.5) 2
student assistants, 0.5 FTE each Susan Kellogg-Smith, Buyer II,
Procurement Manager Adrienne Ruff, Administrative
Assistant III |
4.
Computer Support (3 FTE) Todd Merport, Programmer Analyst
IV, Supervisor Madeleine Leullier, Computer
Resources Specialist II (0.75) Olek
Prokurowski, Programmer Analyst III Changrui Yin, Programmer Analyst
III (0.5) |
5. Technology Management Bill Flounders, Principal
Development Engineer, Manager Xiaofan Meng, Senior Development
Engineer − Cryoelectronics Matt Wasilik, Associate Development Engineer − BSAC |
►
Machine Shop (4.5 FTE) Bob Amaral, Development
Technician V Robert Connolly, Development
Technician V Joe Gavazza, Principal
Laboratory Mechanician Nancy Peshette, Administrative Assistant III (0.5) |
Table 2 - Operational Staff Groups
F i n a n
c i a l R e s o u r c e s
Unit |
Income |
Expenditures |
Performance |
No. of PIs Billed |
$2,880,295 |
$2,915,008 |
1 % [-] |
99 |
|
Machine Shop |
$380,866 |
$398,085 |
4.5 % [-] |
47 |
30 June
2007
III. COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL
Membership
Microlab monthly membership was over
300 this past year, same as in preceding years. Overall, we dealt with 502
members during FY 2006/07 (see Table 4 below).
Fiscal Year |
Membership/Month |
Lab Use-Hrs |
Sp. Equip. Use-Hrs. |
2000/2001 2001/2002 2002/2003 2003/2004 2004/2005 2005/2006 2006/2007 |
345 315 326 331 315 345 317 |
45,413 39,288 43,455 40,823 40,394 48,201 45,696 |
39,383 36,738 37,676 34,692 38,798 44,992 45,699 |
Table 4 -
Microlab Utilization
Berkeley
Microlab Affiliates (BMLA)
Industrial membership, BMLA is currently
numbering 26.
Document Control & Training
The Microlab’s operating manual consists of 1,391 pages
compiled in 163 chapters, available on-line from the web portal of the Microlab,
http://microlab.berkeley.edu/text/labmanual.html
We continue to expend considerable effort to keep
documentation up-to-date. We expect labmembers to use the on-line manual (and
hard copy) as the first step in finding operational and process information;
thus, we take care that the information is up-to-date. The oldest date on equipment
operating manuals is 2005. In addition, 38 equipment have written test
requirements for qualifications, which we also maintain and update regularly.
The task of writing new manuals, appending, updating existing
ones with the latest information, is shared by staff and expert users of the
tools, with process staff carrying most of the burden. Madeleine Leullier,
Computer Resources Specialist, has the assignment of document control, i.e.
editing and installation of both on-line and hard-copy manuals and written
tests.
Outreach
During the Summer of 2007 we again
had two students participating in our Summer Internship for High School Girls
program. They worked under the guidance of Jimmy Chang. Process engineer, and
Daniel Queen, a graduate student labmember, who also worked part time for the
Microlab during the Summer. We will continue the program this coming Summer, http://microlab.berkeley.edu/text/MLOutreach.html,
for which we have selected two applicants from Bay Area high schools.
IV. SUMMARY
The year of 2007 moved along smoothly in the Microlab.
Steady state operations continued, along with anticipation of the realization
of the new lab. Support from our PIs was strong throughout the year, which meant that we were able to end the
fiscal year on target and did not have to raise fees. We are looking forward to
our new lab to become reality.